Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 31.0.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Codellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.842.9
Released—2026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked1415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
LMArena Coding1046—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
ALE-Bench—621.92
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1032—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.78

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1056—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1011—
LMArena Chinese976—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1028—

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1013—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1066—
LMArena Creative Writing1032—
LMArena Multi-Turn1015—

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper