Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs MiniMax-M2

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiniMax-M2 leads 37.3 to 18.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 45% for Llama 3.1-405B and 57.8% for MiniMax-M2.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Llama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Noometry Index30.737.4
Released2024-07-232025-10-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked4221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
LMArena Coding12911370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena WebDev—1297
WeirdML21.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%57.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts12691357
SimpleBench23%—
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%
DTBench61.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
LMArena Math12811352
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert12431337
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English12481313
LMArena Chinese12421366
LMArena French12791335
LMArena German12521355
LMArena Russian12651331
LMArena Spanish12601326
LMArena Japanese1208—
LMArena Korean1184—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following12591328
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query12661331

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiniMax-M2
LMArena Text12841340
LMArena Creative Writing12621286
LMArena Multi-Turn12971361
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and MiniMax-M2 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper