Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Llama 3.1-405B

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 35.5 to 18.4.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index37.630.7
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1342

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Coding13081291
WeirdML—21.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
TheAgentCompany—7.4%
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Hard Prompts12571269
SimpleBench—23%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—45%
DTBench—61.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—82.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.75
ForecastBench—59.9
HellaSwag—89.2%
PIQA—85.9%
WinoGrande—89.2%

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Math12681281
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—9.7%
Omni-MATH—24.9%
MATH Level 5—49.8%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Expert12521243
GPQA Diamond—50.9%
MMLU-Pro—72.3%
Confabulations—17.6%
GPQA (HELM)—52.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—95.3%
MMLU—84.5%
TriviaQA—82.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Llama 3.1-405B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Too close to call

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Non-English12361248
LMArena Chinese12871242
LMArena Russian12431265
LMArena French—1279
LMArena German—1252
LMArena Japanese—1208
LMArena Korean—1184
LMArena Spanish—1260

Instruction Following Too close to call

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Instruction Following12511259
IFEval—81.1%

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Longer Query12801266

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Text12631284
LMArena Creative Writing12481262
LMArena Multi-Turn12541297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—870
WildBench—78.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Llama 3.1-405B?

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Llama 3.1-405B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper