Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiniMax-M2

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Noometry Index30.837.4
Released—2025-10-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Coding10461370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena WebDev—1297
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning Too close to call

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Hard Prompts10321357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Math10561352

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert—1337

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English10111313
LMArena Chinese9761366
LMArena French—1335
LMArena German—1355
LMArena Russian—1331
LMArena Spanish—1326

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following10281328

Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query10131331

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Text10661340
LMArena Creative Writing10321286
LMArena Multi-Turn10151361

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiniMax-M2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper