Model comparison
Granite 4.1 8b vs Llama 3.1-405B
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 36.4 to 18.4.
Side by side
| Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 30.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1-405B leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | 1291 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 21.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 7.4% |
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | 1269 |
| SimpleBench | — | 23% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 45% |
| DTBench | — | 61.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 82.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.75 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.9 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89.2% |
| PIQA | — | 85.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 89.2% |
Math Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1281 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 9.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 49.8% |
Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | 1243 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 50.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 17.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 52.2% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 95.3% |
| MMLU | — | 84.5% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.7% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1248 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1242 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1265 |
| LMArena French | — | 1279 |
| LMArena German | — | 1252 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1184 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1260 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | 1259 |
| IFEval | — | 81.1% |
Long Context Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Llama 3.1-405B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | 1284 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1297 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 870 |
| WildBench | — | 78.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Llama 3.1-405B?
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.1 8b or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?
Llama 3.1-405B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Llama 3.1-405B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.