Model comparison
Llama 2-7B vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 28.0.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | — |
Reasoning Llama 2-7B leads
Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | — |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | — |
| LMArena French | 970 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-7B better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.