Model comparison
Llama 2-7B vs Qwen3-4B
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-4B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads
Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |
Math Too close to call
Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1042 | — |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | — |
| LMArena French | 970 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-7B better than Qwen3-4B?
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Qwen3-4B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.