Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

28.9

Rank #309 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.5

Rank #260 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 42.9.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Medium 3.1 specifications
Claude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index28.931.5
Released2024-10-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—131K
Max output—105K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked493

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
NYT Connections (extended)—6.5%
CritPt0%—
Thematic Generalization—20.3%
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
LMArena Math1244—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1262—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1172—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMistral Medium 3.1
EQ-Bench Creative Writing11461476
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper