Model comparison
Llama 2-7B vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 28.0.
Side by side
| Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1425 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 970 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1420 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-7B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-7B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.