Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 9.9.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 118K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or MiMo-V2-Flash?
Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.