Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 14.7.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.241.3
Released2024-10-222025-12-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
SciCode27.4%25.9%
LMArena Coding12861443
Aider Polyglot28%—
LMArena WebDev—1330
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding51.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—
ALE-Bench—737.95

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
CritPt0%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts12511420
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench56.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math12441396
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LiveBench Math35.5%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert12081425
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English12381392
LMArena Chinese12291462
LMArena French12641429
LMArena German12371395
LMArena Japanese11751325
LMArena Korean11731358
LMArena Russian12531387
LMArena Spanish12611420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12411392
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%—
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12611409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text12551411
LMArena Creative Writing12331375
LMArena Multi-Turn12651404
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LiveBench Language35.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper