Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Llama 2-7B
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 28.0.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1002 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1009 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 99.06 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 970 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 995 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1007 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1006 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 999 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1029 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Llama 2-7B?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Llama 2-7B better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Llama 2-7B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.