Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 37.9 to 20.3.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 46.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1538 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1511 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1497 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1548 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1490 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1500 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1463 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.