Model comparison

Laguna M.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Laguna M.1 Poolside

31.9

Rank #252 Reported

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 21.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 0% for Laguna M.1 and 43% for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Laguna M.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Laguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderPoolsideMeta
Noometry Index31.949.8
Released2026-04-282026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1.05M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked328

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev13481532
DeepSWE—54.9%
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%
LMArena Coding—1497

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1490
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.18

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
ProofBench0%43%

Knowledge Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
LMArena Expert—1485

Multimodal Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1304

Multilingual Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English—1479
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1494

Instruction Following Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following—1466

Long Context Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query—1483

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text—1486
LMArena Creative Writing—1444
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
LMArena Multi-Turn—1504

Frequently asked questions

Is Laguna M.1 better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Laguna M.1 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper