Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.4 to 14.2.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1235 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1220 |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1233 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.