Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 34.1.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderMoonshot AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.633.0
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14841130
LMArena WebDev1404—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14431127

Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14421173

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14401108

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Vision1254—

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14061094
LMArena Chinese14491108
LMArena French14031110
LMArena German14131101
LMArena Korean1378954
LMArena Russian14041145
LMArena Spanish14471095
LMArena Japanese—1042

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14301113

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14351120

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14201138
LMArena Creative Writing13811107
LMArena Multi-Turn14271088

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper