Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 36.4 to 13.3.
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 32.6 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1236 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1220 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1233 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.