Model comparison
Hy3 vs Qwen3-1.7B
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 16.3.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.13 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.53 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hy3: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.