Model comparison
Hy3 vs Qwen Turbo
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0825 / $0.33 for Hy3.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Qwen Turbo?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.0825 and $0.33.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.