Model comparison
Hy3 vs Mistral Nemo
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 28.5.
- Both cost about the same: $0.0825 input and $0.33 output per million tokens.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hy3: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Mistral Nemo?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Mistral Nemo?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo lists at $0.15 and $0.15.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.