Model comparison

Hy3 vs Mixtral 8x7B

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hy3 leads 40.8 to 11.0.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $0.70 for Mixtral 8x7B.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 32K.

Side by side

Hy3 and Mixtral 8x7B specifications
Hy3Mixtral 8x7B
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index44.227.1
Released2026-07-062023-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K32K
Max output128K32K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0825$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$0.33$0.70
Results tracked1938

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Coding14641126
LMArena WebDev1508—
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Hard Prompts14471115
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
DTBench—49.6%
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.47
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag—86.7%
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Math14751147
Omni-MATH—10.5%
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Expert14601088
GPQA Diamond—30.6%
MMLU-Pro—33.5%
GPQA (HELM)—29.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English14261077
LMArena Chinese14931055
LMArena French14611166
LMArena German14391114
LMArena Japanese1392931
LMArena Korean1395968
LMArena Russian14321090
LMArena Spanish14561111

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Instruction Following14261109
IFEval—57.5%

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query14421103

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text14391132
LMArena Creative Writing14021109
LMArena Multi-Turn14361115
WildBench—67.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Mixtral 8x7B?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x7B lists at $0.70 and $0.70.

Is Hy3 or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Mixtral 8x7B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper