Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs phi-3-medium 14B
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 41.8 to 36.8.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.