Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 27.1.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.129.7
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding14181039
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14161028

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math—1089

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert—984

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13821000
LMArena Chinese—1016
LMArena French—1039
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Russian—1004
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13971023

Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1404996

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14051050
LMArena Creative Writing13881024
LMArena Multi-Turn1422989

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper