Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs phi-3-medium 14B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 40.2 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.