Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.4 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 42.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1419 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1417 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1383 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1398 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1405 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1389 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1423 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.