Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1466 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1445 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
Multimodal MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | 1228 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.