Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Grok 4.3 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.3 leads 35.9 to 28.9.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 specifications
Grok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index43.843.1
Released2026-04-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked409

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding14151418
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts13961416
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—
LMArena Math1388—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—
LMArena Expert1385—

Multimodal Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision12291180
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English13851382
LMArena Chinese1422—
LMArena French1412—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1356—
LMArena Russian1399—
LMArena Spanish1398—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following13661397

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query13931404

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text13971405
LMArena Creative Writing13801388
LMArena Multi-Turn14061422
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Grok 4.3 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok 4.3 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.6 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper