Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Qwen3 Max

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Max in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 22.6.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Qwen3 Max specifications
Hunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.143.7
Released—2025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked933

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
LMArena Coding14181456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14161448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.38

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LMArena Math—1446
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
LMArena Expert—1455

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Qwen3 Max: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English13821429
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13971419

Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query14041438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3 Max
LMArena Text14051439
LMArena Creative Writing13881402
LMArena Multi-Turn14221446

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Qwen3 Max?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Qwen3 Max share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper