Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance SeedSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 24.1.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1466 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1445 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1430 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1449 |
Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1228 |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1434 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1428 |
Long Context Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.5 vs 43.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.