Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Wizardlm 70b
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 34.8.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1081 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1079 |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1093 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Wizardlm 70b?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.