Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Wizardlm 70b

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 34.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Wizardlm 70b
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.333.0
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding13611081

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts13741079

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math13591116

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1339—

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English13631078
LMArena Chinese14171052
LMArena German13551083
LMArena Russian13681155
LMArena French1391—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1351—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13441093

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13661097

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13771120
LMArena Creative Writing13591149
LMArena Multi-Turn13871108

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper