Model comparison

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Wizardlm 70b

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.3 to 34.8.

Side by side

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
ProviderMoonshot AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.233.0
Released2025-07-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.57—
Output $ / M tokens$2.30—
Results tracked4212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding13991081
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)63.4%—
Aider Polyglot59.1%—
GSO4.9%—
WeirdML42.8%—
ALE-Bench597.5—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), Wizardlm 70b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
Terminal-Bench35.7%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard59.1%—
METR Time Horizons59.2%—

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts13841079
SimpleBench26.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.01—
ForecastBench60.2—

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math13971116
Omni-MATH65.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
MMLU-Pro81.9%—
Confabulations20.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.9%—
GPQA (HELM)65.3%—
LMArena Expert1365—

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English13721078
LMArena Chinese14151052
LMArena German13871083
LMArena Russian13851155
LMArena French1379—
LMArena Japanese1349—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Spanish1386—

Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13481093
IFEval85%—

Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13531097
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench17.6%—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13801120
LMArena Creative Writing13501149
LMArena Multi-Turn13711108
Short-Story Creative Writing85.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1666—
WildBench86.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Wizardlm 70b?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper