Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Wizardlm 70b
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 34.8.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1081 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1079 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1093 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Wizardlm 70b?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Wizardlm 70b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.