Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1361 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1374 |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1359 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1339 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1344 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.