Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs QwQ-32B
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 4 categories and QwQ-32B in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 41.6.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1324 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than QwQ-32B?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and QwQ-32B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.