Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 7 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 52.5.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1361 |
Reasoning Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1374 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
Math Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1359 |
Knowledge Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1339 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1368 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1344 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (39.5 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.