Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 27.8 to 13.7.

Side by side

Grok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index39.941.3
Released2025-04-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding14321361
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts14341374
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math Too close to call

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math13911359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert14211339
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English14101363
LMArena Chinese14481417
LMArena French14601391
LMArena German14311355
LMArena Japanese13871342
LMArena Korean13731351
LMArena Russian14161368
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following14091344
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query14391366
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkGrok 3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text14261377
LMArena Creative Writing14141359
LMArena Multi-Turn14251387
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper