Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 25.8.
  • Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Olmo 7b Instruct
ProviderTencentAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.330.3
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1610

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding13611016

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1374993

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math13591018

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Expert1339—

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1363977
LMArena Chinese14171014
LMArena Russian1368947
LMArena French1391—
LMArena German1355—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1351—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1344978

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1366—

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text13771032
LMArena Creative Writing1359990
LMArena Multi-Turn13871007

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper