Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Olmo 7b Instruct
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.9 to 26.0.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1016 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 993 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141), Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1391 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 946 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101), Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.