Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Olmo 7b Instruct
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 25.8.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1016 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 993 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 947 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.