Model comparison

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.3 to 25.8.

Side by side

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
ProviderMoonshot AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.230.3
Released2025-07-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.57—
Output $ / M tokens$2.30—
Results tracked4210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding13991016
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)63.4%—
Aider Polyglot59.1%—
GSO4.9%—
WeirdML42.8%—
ALE-Bench597.5—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
Terminal-Bench35.7%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard59.1%—
METR Time Horizons59.2%—

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1384993
SimpleBench26.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.01—
ForecastBench60.2—

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math13971018
Omni-MATH65.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
MMLU-Pro81.9%—
Confabulations20.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.9%—
GPQA (HELM)65.3%—
LMArena Expert1365—

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1372977
LMArena Chinese14151014
LMArena Russian1385947
LMArena French1379—
LMArena German1387—
LMArena Japanese1349—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Spanish1386—

Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1348978
IFEval85%—

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench17.6%—
LMArena Longer Query1353—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text13801032
LMArena Creative Writing1350990
LMArena Multi-Turn13711007
Short-Story Creative Writing85.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1666—
WildBench86.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper