Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 36.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 60.9% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderXiaomiXiaomi
Noometry Index50.341.3
Released2026-09-212025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.28
Results tracked1921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena WebDev16291330
SciCode60.9%25.9%
LMArena Coding15341443
ALE-Bench1,158737.95

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
APEX-Agents59.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
CritPt26.6%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts15121420

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math14941396
ProofBench70%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert15431425

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision1264—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English14741392
LMArena Chinese15291462
LMArena Russian14801387
LMArena French—1429
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1358
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14931392

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query15011409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text14921411
LMArena Creative Writing14681375
LMArena Multi-Turn14641404

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper