Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 27.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index41.350.3
Released—2026-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1631

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Coding13611495
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1533
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts13741486
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.87

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Math13591471
ProofBench—43%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert13391480
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English13631478
LMArena Chinese14171511
LMArena French13911513
LMArena Russian13681487
LMArena German1355—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1351—
LMArena Spanish—1498

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following13441461

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query13661475

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text13771482
LMArena Creative Writing13591449
LMArena Multi-Turn13871494
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper