Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 26.1 to 16.9.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Trinity Large Thinking specifications
Hunyuan Turbo 0110Trinity Large Thinking
ProviderTencentArcee AI
Noometry Index39.638.6
Released—2026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—80K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked1124

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Coding13191381
LMArena WebDev—1238
SciCode—36.1%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Hard Prompts13081350
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%

Math Trinity Large Thinking leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Math12731366

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Trinity Large Thinking
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%
LMArena Expert—1360

Multilingual Trinity Large Thinking leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English12851325
LMArena Chinese13581373
LMArena Russian13051337
LMArena French—1374
LMArena German—1356
LMArena Japanese—1311
LMArena Korean—1306
LMArena Spanish—1357

Instruction Following Trinity Large Thinking leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following12781334

Long Context Trinity Large Thinking leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query13091355

Writing & Preference Trinity Large Thinking leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text13111340
LMArena Creative Writing12691320
LMArena Multi-Turn13031342

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper