Model comparison
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
GPT-5.1-Codex and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.2 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.1-Codex leads 41.7 to 38.0.
Side by side
| GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.2 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2025-11-12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads
GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.7 (#107), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1320 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,245 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 37.8 (#32), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 60.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 70.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1308 |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
GPT-5.1-Codex: 29.3 (#218), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1273 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1279 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1303 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
GPT-5.1-Codex and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.2 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.7 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.