Model comparison
Nova 2 Lite vs Trinity Large Thinking
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index. Trinity Large Thinking costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova 2 Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Arcee AISummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova 2 Lite leads 27.5 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.
- Nova 2 Lite accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 64K | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1385 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121), Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |
Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1364 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Too close to call
Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1366 |
Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | 1360 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1337 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1364 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1381 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1343 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1271 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1373 | 1357 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | 1334 |
Long Context Too close to call
Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1335 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1362 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1291 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2 Lite better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index. Trinity Large Thinking costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova 2 Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Trinity Large Thinking?
Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Nova 2 Lite or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Trinity Large Thinking share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.