Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen3 8B
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 26.1 to 16.6.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 33.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen3 8B?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen3 8B better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen3 8B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.