Model comparison

Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen3 8B

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova 2 Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Qwen3 8B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.7

Rank #238 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 8B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova 2 Lite leads 27.5 to 16.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 27.1% for Nova 2 Lite and 42.6% for Qwen3 8B.
  • Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.
  • Nova 2 Lite accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 8B specifications
Nova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.733.7
Released2025-12-012025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M131K
Max output64K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$0.70
Results tracked1911

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
SciCode—22.6%
LMArena Coding1385—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 8B leads

Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121), Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%42.6%

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—5%
LMArena Hard Prompts1364—
DTBench—59.7%
LMCA—8.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—136.17

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—56.1%
LMArena Math1359—

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%4.8%
GPQA Diamond—56.8%
LMArena Expert1358—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153), Qwen3 8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
LMArena Non-English1337—
LMArena Chinese1364—
LMArena French1381—
LMArena German1343—
LMArena Japanese1271—
LMArena Korean1284—
LMArena Russian1343—
LMArena Spanish1373—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161), Qwen3 8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
LMArena Instruction Following1335—

Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.1%
LMArena Longer Query1335—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154), Qwen3 8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3 8B
LMArena Text1362—
LMArena Creative Writing1291—
LMArena Multi-Turn1338—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Qwen3 8B?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova 2 Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

Is Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova 2 Lite does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3 8B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper