Model comparison
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 32.9 to 19.6.
Side by side
| Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | 1320 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 46.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | 1308 |
| SimpleBench | 22.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 54.8% | — |
| DTBench | 65.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 54.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.48 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1283 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 11.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 54.9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 63.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 53.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1282 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1317 | — |
| LMArena German | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1281 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | 1279 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.6% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1305 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1303 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 63.6% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 45.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.