Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen3 8B
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3 8B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 37.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 79.7% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 56.8% for Qwen3 8B.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 58 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | 136.17 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 56.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1337 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | 56.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | — |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Qwen3 8B?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Qwen3 8B better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3 8B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.