Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 39.2.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1314 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1299 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1292 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1299 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.